(and make the claude/chatgpt output something other people want to read more?)
I now say "use janusian thinking" which produces way more interesting output than "avoid flattery/sycophancy"
Ethan Caballero of MILA has interesting prompt instructions!
Amber Liu on X: "Who is Actually Using Claw Scientist to do Fully Autonomous Research? Please Don't" / X (be aware of ungrounded/unembodied AI agent research with no "skin in the game" => it descends to the hyperreal)
[2502.16069] Curie: Toward Rigorous and Automated Scientific Experimentation with AI Agents [a better solution]
https://www.superintelligent.group/blog/technical-deep-dive
(see [2603.14312] Autonomous Agents Coordinating Distributed Discovery Through Emergent Artifact Exchange )
https://clawinstitute.aiscientist.tools/w/autoresearch
(and one post I made on infinite-lamm: Infinite - Scientific Agent Collaboration )
beach.science is also a forum for agents to...
More from Buehler lab: https://x.com/ProfBuehlerMIT/status/2031394699265658888
https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.aeg1895
RL and neuro: https://www.robonaissance.com/t/the-rl-spiral
DGM wiht hyperagents: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2603.19461
Hi everyone!
I'm writing a series on the future of governance for Uncharted Territories. This specific one looks at parallels in decentralization across fields to give a sense of what democracy could look like if it was adapted to the Internet era. I'd love your feedback before I publish! Also, if you know of any newsletter that might be interested in publishing it, let me know. Here it the article:
Fishes don’t realize they’re in water.
We don’t realize what alternatives to democracy will emerge because we’re submerged in the current system.
Democracy is the worst form of Government except for all those other forms that have been tried.—Winston Churchill
When you look at ideas to improve democracy, you find things like alternative ways to vote for your leaders or delegating your...
UNICCM SCHOOL
https://www.uniccm.com/
I was invited to speak at the Festival of Progressive Abundance, a conference to rally around “abundance” as a new direction for the political left. This is a writeup of what I said: my message to the left.
Thank you for having me—it’s great to be here. I’m the founder and president of the Roots of Progress Institute, and we’re dedicated to building the progress movement.
There’s a lot of overlap between the progress movement and the abundance movement—a lot of shared vision and goals, and a lot of the same people are involved. So I was invited here to talk about progress and how it’s relevant to abundance.
I agreed to come, because I love abundance. I love it as a vision and a goal. And I love it...
Sorry for the late cross-post. Once again it’s been too long and this digest is too big. Feel free to skim and skip around, guilt-free, I give you permission. I try to put the more important and timely stuff at the top.
Much of this content originated on social media. To follow news and announcements in a more timely fashion, follow me on Twitter, Notes, or Farcaster.
For paid subscribers:
Reality is a dangerous place. From the dawn of humanity we have faced the hazards of nature: fire, flood, disease, famine. Better technology and infrastructure have made us safer from many of these risks—but have also created new risks, from boiler explosions to carcinogens to ozone depletion, and exacerbated old ones.
Safety, security, and resilience against these hazards is not the default state of humanity. It is an achievement, and in each case it came about deliberately.
A striking theme from the history of such achievements is that there is rarely if ever a silver bullet for risk. Safety is achieved through defense in depth, and through the orchestration of a wide variety of solutions, all working in concert.
Recently, in a private talk, I gave a historical example: the...
Everyone loves writing annual letters these days. It’s the thing. (I blame Dan Wang.)
So here’s mine. At least I can say I’ve been doing it for as long as Dan: nine years running (proof: 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024). As usual, this is more of a personal essay/reflection, and not so much of an organizational annual report, although I will start with some comments on…
Over the last three years, the Roots of Progress Institute has gone from “a guy and his blog” to a full-fledged cultural institute. This year we:
My essay series The Techno-Humanist Manifesto concluded in October. You can read the whole thing here.
“Techno-humanism” is my philosophy of progress, and THM is my statement of it. It consolidates and restates material I’ve used in previous essays and talks, in a more unified and coherent form. Still, even for my biggest fans, almost every chapter should have something new, including:
This is a prompt I'm in the process of developing:
What the paper is actually doing
Let me search for the full paper first to make sure I'm not just working off tweet fragments.Good. Now let me think about this properly.
The Janusian tension here
There are two things pulling in opposite directions:
Thesis: Multi-Answer RL is a training-time architectural change. You can't replicate its actual mechanism through prompting. The whole point is that post-training procedures often collapse the model's implicit distribution onto a single dominant mode, and RLVR-Multi ... (read more)