All of Yarrow B.'s Comments + Replies

Neither EA nor e/acc is what we need to build the future

A potential area of overlap between effective altruism and Roots of Progress is the non-profit New Harvest, which funds research into making meat, eggs, and milk without animals.  

Marc Andreessen pens “Techno-Optimist Manifesto.” Discuss

What’s a good alternative word for someone who has a strong conviction in the past, present, and future benefits of technology?

1jasoncrawford6moGood question, I don't know. People have been talking about “progress studies” or the “progress movement” or “progress community”, and others have talked about the “abundance agenda”, but none of those lend themselves to personal labels/identities…
Banning self-driving cars will not atone for urban planning’s sins

In theory, if they could be made to work, self-driving cars would be one of the best technologies ever. In practice, the technology seems stuck in a rut. Although exact statistics are hard to come by, the number of human interventions seems to remain high.

There is a very high burden of proof for self-driving car companies like Cruise and Waymo; they need to convincingly demonstrate, using robust statistical evidence, that their vehicles are indeed significantly safer than human drivers in the same locales. Cruise, Waymo, et al. have certainly had plenty of... (read more)

Marc Andreessen pens “Techno-Optimist Manifesto.” Discuss

I think Ezra Klein has a lucid take on the "manifesto". Ezra observes that it's a covert anti-wokeness rant:

It's a mistake to read his manifesto as about technology. It's about how we were once brave and strong and we have become soft and weak.

In Ezra's New York Times column on Andreessen's rant, he writes:

It’s a coalition obsessed with where we went wrong: the weakness, the political correctness, the liberalism, the trigger warnings, the smug elites. It’s a coalition that believes we were once hard and have become soft; worse, we have come to lionize so
... (read more)
1jasoncrawford6moI have never particularly liked the term “techno-optimism” anyway. “Optimism” on its own is confusing enough [https://rootsofprogress.org/descriptive-vs-prescriptive-optimism]. “Techno-optimism” implies that not only do you think we can solve all problems, but that technology will be the solution to all of them, which is not really true.