All of rebeccarapple's Comments + Replies

Thoughts on Meaning & Work

Some thoughts on Meaning & Modern Job Satisfaction

Jason recently shared a thread on the tension between the objective criteria that make work meaningful increasing while the subjective experience of perceived meaning of work seems to be decreasing. As with most things related to progress, much of this likely stems from a combination of rising expectations and the current emotional climate of pessimism. However, with the help of several conversations, I believe that I've identified two elements that may help further explain the gap between objective and... (read more)

The lure of technocracy

epistemic confidence: low -- just an idea

As I've thought about these shifts, one idea that keeps coming up for me is the idea of "the enemy / crisis" -- there was a very clear enemy during technocrats birth (World Wars, Economic Crisis). The death happened essentially as the first generation without an "enemy / crisis" as their foundational story -- and, as they weren't driven by fear or the purpose of defeating the enemy, they are less likely to be willing to give power or listen to authority.  Even Vietnam was a war that lacked a threat or enemy tha... (read more)

Pre-publication draft of "Death is the Default: Why building is our safest way forward"

Hey Gena! Thanks for sharing. 

Here's a thought for ya -- it seems to me like you're trying to make an inspirational kick in the pants for people to take action -- fight entropy -- and go through a handful of challenges that prevent people from acting (I picked out "hoplessness" and "safer to do nothing"). I think another challenge that might be good to address from a psych perspective is "Why me? Or "I don't know the answer" -- which is partially addressed in your piece with the idea that building is iterative and process driven (and you certainly don... (read more)

1Gena Gorlin2yThank you for the excellent feedback, Rebecca!! Would love your or others' thoughts on the revised draft linked above, and also copied below: Death is the default Subtitle: Why building is our safest way forward In the early stages of starting a company, founders stare in the face of one of the stark realities of human existence: the fact that death is the default. Their product or service did not exist in the world before they started building it, and it will quickly fizzle back out of existence if they step away from it. It’s like those horrible, murderous villains in Dr. Who, the “Weeping Angles,” [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weeping_Angel] who stand still as long as you’re watching them, but rapidly close in on you the moment you so much as blink. Or so it often feels, anyway. In fact, there are no murderous villains waiting to close in on you in the startup case; there are just the blind, indifferent forces of inertia and entropy. Most startups don’t die because someone is actively trying to kill them, but simply because the founders stop trying to keep them alive. [http://www.paulgraham.com/die.html] This state of affairs is by no means unique to founders. It is a literal law of nature that every living being must grapple with. As Steven Pinker reminds us in Enlightenment Now [https://www.amazon.com/Enlightenment-Now-Science-Humanism-Progress-ebook/dp/B073TJBYTB/ref=sr_1_1?crid=Z30Z2ZBE92LZ&keywords=enlightenment+now&qid=1651605161&sprefix=enlightenment+now%2Caps%2C100&sr=8-1] , the “first keystone in understanding the human condition is the concept of entropy”: the inexorable fact, captured by the Second Law of Thermodynamics, that left to its own devices, a system always moves toward stillness, randomness, and disorder. “Life and happiness depend,” he continues, “on an infinitesimal sliver of orderly arrangements of matter amid the astronomical number of possibilities… Far more of the arrangements of matter found on Earth are of no worldly use to u
Where is “Progress Studies” Going?

I agree with distinctions between applied policy advocacy - with significant intellectual diversity of opinion - and conceptual advocacy, which is axiomatic to the field - the idea that progress is "real, desirable and possible".

I wan to posit an addition flavor of study and applied advocacy, one that is human, rather than progress focused. It asks how we can help people (especially the early/late majority) adapt to increasing rates of progress and change and avoid the worst fates of progress losers. This rather sits squarely between applied and conceptual... (read more)