Hi there! I don't think many people have time to read 10,000 words of what may be unvetted AI slop that you have provided no indication of what went into ensuring it'd be worthwhile to read or what the prompts were or how much you personally endorse or stand by it and will take the blame for any confabulations, errors, oversimplifications, or other standard problems with LLM outputs.
Perhaps you could explicitly highlight the 'neglected points' of value and explain what novel data or computations support them?
Hi there! I don't think many people have time to read 10,000 words of what may be unvetted AI slop that you have provided no indication of what went into ensuring it'd be worthwhile to read or what the prompts were or how much you personally endorse or stand by it and will take the blame for any confabulations, errors, oversimplifications, or other standard problems with LLM outputs.
Perhaps you could explicitly highlight the 'neglected points' of value and explain what novel data or computations support them?
Thanks. 🤗