On the point of talent being equally distributed, I think this is both self-evident and substantiated by many examples and the data. One example that is quite familiar is the proliferation of Indian immigrants now running the global technology companies. A empirical point is the paper we cite on IMO scores, which highlights the existence of talent and the subsequent limitations of opportunity: "an equally talented teenager with the same IMO score born in a low-income country produces 30% fewer publications and receives 50% fewer citations than a participa
1Daniel Paleka2yIt's easy to disprove an equal distribution; however, it's also very easy to
disprove a distribution that closely fits opportunities (say, measured by
economic development).
I'd also like to note that IMO performance is a strong but quite noisy signal of
top talent distribution, due to some countries' educational and career systems
not particularly caring about it (France comes to mind); some countries
kneecapping their performance on purpose (China doesn't let anyone participate
twice), and the cultural importance of high-school competitions varying between
countries.
2patio112ysigh DNS issues, I swear. (It is designed to redirect to vaccines.gov, which
seems to be the best thing for patients and therefore what we should do.)