The US is experiencing a great decline in trust. According to the US General Social Survey, people who agreed with the statement "most people can be trusted" went from 49% to 25% between 1984 and 2022.[1]
Trust in institutions is also falling. Over that same period trust in the government fell from 42% to 20%.
For civil services it fell from 56% to 41%, for the police it fell from 74% to 68%, and for congress it fell from 52% to a whopping 15%.[2]
Even international institutions, like the United Nations, are losing trust, going from 47% to 44%.
It’s not just institutions, organizations are also losing trust. According to the WVS, over that same period public trust in the press declined from 49% to 29%, trust in major companies declined...
Last fall the Roots of Progress Institute hosted the first annual Progress Conference. 200 people excited about human progress gathered for two days in Berkeley, California, to share ideas in deep conversation, catalyze new projects, and get energized and inspired. Several attendees even said it was the best conference they had ever attended. We shared more about our reflections here, including a list of over a dozen write-ups from writers such as Noah Smith, Packy McCormick, Scott Alexander, and many more.
Whenever a new movement is growing, an annual event like this is important to build its community and establish its identity. So, after last year’s great reception, we’re excited to announce Progress Conference 2025. It will be bigger, longer, and better, as we build on last year’s...
I was wondering if anyone has a good response to Toby Ord's reservations about progress studies.
In summary, Ord argues that it's far from obvious that advancing progress is inherently good or bad, since this depends on whether it also accelerates humanity's extinction, undermining standard economic arguments for progress.
There's a common story we tell about innovation — that it's a relentless march across the frontier, led by fundamental breakthroughs in engineering, science, research, etc. Progress, according to this story, is mainly about overcoming hard technological bottlenecks. But even in heavily optimized and well-funded competitive industries, there is a surprising amount of innovation that happens that doesn't require any new advances in research or engineering, that isn't about pushing the absolute frontier, and actually could have happened at any point before.
Road Cycling is an example of a heavily optimized sport - where huge sums of money get spent on R&D, trying to make bikes as fast and comfortable as possible, while there are millions of enthusiast recreational riders, always trying to do whatever they can to...
This is a linkpost for my book review from my personal blog, Trajectory. Read the original post (and subscribe to the newsletter) here: https://blog.jovono.com/p/book-review-abundance-by-ezra-klein
“The best lack all conviction, while the worst/Are full of passionate intensity.”
William Butler Yeats, The Second Coming
Abundance, by Ezra Klein and Derek Thompson, is the newest and most anticipated release of a series of books that have recently come out on the topic of improving progressive governance, like Dunkelman’s Why Nothing Works, Demsas’s On the Housing Crisis, and Appelbaum’s Stuck. Particularly given the authors’ fame, Abundance has triggered a significant debate, much more than the other books in this subgenre.
Abundance exists in the context of a conversation the authors helped start that focuses on maximizing outputs rather than inputs. It goes by several names,...
I asked Claude to write new lyrics for Ode to Joy, with the theme of progress. The result was wonderful! So I am sharing it here.
Fields of plenty, golden harvests
Where once famine stalked the land
Human ingenuity triumphs
Food for every outstretched hand
Engines, circuits, wheels in motion
Labors eased by human minds
What once broke the backs of billions
Now by clever tools designed
Ships and railways, planes connecting
Distant shores to distant shores
Nations trade in peaceful commerce
Through their open, welcoming doors
City lights that shine like beacons
Where once darkness ruled the night
Voices, faces cross vast oceans
Binding hearts through waves of light
Plagues that once decimated nations
Now retreat before our will
Lives extended, pain diminished
Not by prayer but by our skill
From the shadows of past conflicts
Dawn of shared prosperity
Abundance flows through peaceful borders
As one human family
Solar has an average capacity factor in the US of about 25%. Naively, you might think that to turn this into a highly-available power source, you just need to have 4x the solar panels, plus enough batteries to store 75% of a day’s worth of power. E.g., for each continuous megawatt you want to supply, you need 4 MW of solar panels, and 18 MWh of batteries. During the day, you supply 1 MW from the panels and use the other 3 MW to charge the batteries. Overnight, you discharge the batteries to supply continuous power.
Turns out it’s not quite that simple. First, the capacity factor varies throughout the year, as the days get shorter in winter. So you at least need to build enough that even...
This essay is cross-posted from https://thegreymatter.substack.com/p/rethinking-the-palm-oil-boycott
What if the crusade to save the planet’s forests by boycotting palm oil is actually accelerating their destruction? Palm oil, vilified as the scourge of rainforests and orangutans alike, was ranked by consumers as the most environmentally damaging vegetable oil in a recent survey. That’s despite its lurking in nearly 50% of supermarket products—from doughnuts and pizza to toothpaste and lipstick. Yet, as environmental researcher Hannah Ritchie argues in her book Not the End of the World, this well-meaning activism could be backfiring, driving worse deforestation elsewhere.
Ritchie’s seemingly counterintuitive claim rests on palm oil’s hidden edge: it’s a productivity powerhouse. Oil palms churn out far more oil per hectare than any rival crop, so boycotting it pushes the world toward less efficient...
I think Leopold Aschenbrenner's argument here is interesting to consider: https://worksinprogress.co/issue/securing-posterity/?ref=forourposterity.com
(full paper https://globalprioritiesinstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/Philip-Trammell-and-Leopold-Aschenbrenner-Existential-Risk-and-Growth.pdf)
Regarding discount rate, 0% discount is pretty common in EA circles, I think, although I think many recognize it should be at least a bit above 0% to account for epistemic uncertainty about how long humans will continue to exist.